<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Individuals and Interactions over processes and tools.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://agilecoach.dk/2009/06/individuals-and-interactions-over-processes-and-tools/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://agilecoach.dk/2009/06/individuals-and-interactions-over-processes-and-tools/</link>
	<description>uncovering better ways of developing  software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:59:33 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tech Per</title>
		<link>http://agilecoach.dk/2009/06/individuals-and-interactions-over-processes-and-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Per</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 18:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://agilecoach.dk/?p=17#comment-3</guid>
		<description>I am fully with you.

Though, I don&#039;t think we as such need to put people on training for becoming better communicators. In my opion, many of us already value individuals and interactions over processes and tools.

It is the simple things, I am talking about. Like skipping a project management tool. Or skipping most of the never-read documentation and sticking with the very little part, that actually gives meaning. Or, going over and talking with someone, instead of just trying to anticipate what they would answer.

Sure, it is always better to sharpen the knife, and as such, courses can be a good thing. But I doubt we will get a good communicator out of a bad one. Like you wont get a good programmer out of a bad one, just by sending him on a course :-)

What I mean is: The truly great teams, are those that happen to - often by sher luck - end up matching each other perfectly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am fully with you.</p>
<p>Though, I don&#8217;t think we as such need to put people on training for becoming better communicators. In my opion, many of us already value individuals and interactions over processes and tools.</p>
<p>It is the simple things, I am talking about. Like skipping a project management tool. Or skipping most of the never-read documentation and sticking with the very little part, that actually gives meaning. Or, going over and talking with someone, instead of just trying to anticipate what they would answer.</p>
<p>Sure, it is always better to sharpen the knife, and as such, courses can be a good thing. But I doubt we will get a good communicator out of a bad one. Like you wont get a good programmer out of a bad one, just by sending him on a course <img src='http://agilecoach.dk/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>What I mean is: The truly great teams, are those that happen to &#8211; often by sher luck &#8211; end up matching each other perfectly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

